IN RE: HYE-YOUNG CHON

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: HYE-YOUNG CHON, respondent, v. COUNTRY-WIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant.

Decided: October 31, 2005

THOMAS A. ADAMS, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, PETER B. SKELOS, and MARK C. DILLON, JJ. Jaffe & Nohavicka, New York, N.Y. (Thomas Torto, Jason Levine, and Paul Golden of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cervini, Jackson Heights, N.Y. (Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, Country-Wide Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dorsa, J.), dated September 28, 2004, as denied its motion, inter alia, to vacate a prior order and judgment (one paper) of the same court entered February 14, 2003, which, upon its default in appearing, granted the petition.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

 To vacate its default, the appellant was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its nonappearance at a hearing and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1] ).   Whether an excuse is reasonable is a determination within the sound discretion of the court (see Abrams v. City of New York, 13 A.D.3d 566, 786 N.Y.S.2d 323).   The appellant's unsubstantiated excuse of law office failure did not rise to the level of a reasonable excuse (see Abrams v. City of New York, supra;  Grezinsky v. Mount Hebron Cemetery, 305 A.D.2d 542, 759 N.Y.S.2d 386;  cf. Empire Chevrolet Sales Corp. v. Spallone, 304 A.D.2d 708, 757 N.Y.S.2d 792).   Therefore, the Supreme Court providently denied the appellant's motion, inter alia, to vacate the order and judgment entered February 14, 2003, upon its default in appearing.

Copied to clipboard