Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

IN RE: LEE S., Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent. Joseph Sluzar, as Broome County Attorney, Respondent; Lee S., Appellant.

Decided: January 29, 2009

Before:  PETERS, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH and STEIN, JJ. Cynthia Feathers, Saratoga Springs, for appellant. Joseph Sluzar, County Attorney, Binghamton (Holly Zurenda-Cruz of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Pines, J.), entered March 24, 2008, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct. Act article 3, to adjudicate respondent a juvenile delinquent.

After forcibly stealing a bicycle, respondent was charged with conduct which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the third degree.   Respondent thereafter admitted to committing the crime of petit larceny in full satisfaction of the petition and was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent.   Following a dispositional hearing, which extended over two days and concluded on March 3, 2008, Family Court ordered respondent placed in the care and custody of the Broome County Department of Social Services for a period of one year.   This appeal by respondent ensued.

 Respondent correctly contends that Family Court failed to comply with the requirements of Family Ct. Act § 321.3(1)(c) (see Matter of Travis TT., 47 A.D.3d 1112, 1113, 849 N.Y.S.2d 712 [2008];  Matter of Robert OO., 34 A.D.3d 1074, 1075, 824 N.Y.S.2d 693 [2006] ).   At the time of his admission, Family Court merely instructed respondent that the court would “still have the authority to enter a new dispositional order which ․ could include placing [him] outside [of] the home.”   Respondent was not made aware of any other possible specific dispositional orders, “nor was he ever told the exact nature of [his] placement [outside of the home] or its possible duration” (Matter of Herbert RR., 214 A.D.2d 891, 892, 625 N.Y.S.2d 362 [1995];  see Family Ct. Act § 321.3[1][c];  Matter of Robert OO., 34 A.D.3d at 1075, 824 N.Y.S.2d 693;  Matter of Timothy M., 225 A.D.2d 915, 639 N.Y.S.2d 182 [1996] ).   Insofar as the provisions of Family Ct. Act § 321.3(1) cannot be waived (see Matter of Travis TT., 47 A.D.3d at 1113, 849 N.Y.S.2d 712;  Matter of Robert OO., 34 A.D.3d at 1075, 824 N.Y.S.2d 693), Family Court's order must be reversed and, since respondent's placement period has not expired, the matter is remitted to Family Court for further proceedings.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Broome County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.


PETERS, J.P., LAHTINEN and STEIN, JJ., concur.

Copied to clipboard