State of New York, City of New York, etc., ex rel. Leonard M. Campagna, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Post Integrations, Inc., et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James E. d'Auguste, J.), entered January 8, 2018, and orders (same court and Justice), entered January 31, 2018, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion to compel discovery of alter ego/veil piercing documents and defendants' federal tax returns and corporate financial documents, and denied defendants' cross motion to strike plaintiff's discovery demands, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The trial court's discovery determinations, unattended by error of law or abuse of discretion, should not be disturbed on appeal (Forman v. Henkin, 30 NY3d 656, 662  ).
Discovery concerning the alter ego/veil piercing allegations is appropriate at this stage (see First Bank of Ams. v. Motor Car Funding, 257 A.D.2d 287, 293–294 [1st Dept 1999] ).
Plaintiff established his entitlement to defendant Post Integrations' federal tax returns, which allegedly contain some of the misrepresentations at issue (see Gama Aviation Inc. v Sandton Capital Partners, LP, 113 AD3d 456, 457 [1st Dept 2014]; Nanbar Realty Corp. v. Pater Realty Co., 242 A.D.2d 208, 209–210 [1st Dept 1997] ).
Defendants' financial statements are central to the claims under New York's False Claims Act (Finance Law § 189 ). Their argument that documents lacking a clear New York nexus are irrelevant misses the point of the allegations that defendants intentionally sought to avoid the payment of New York franchise and corporate taxes.