CAMERON HILL CONSTRUCTION LLC PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. ET AL DEFENDANTS

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

CAMERON HILL CONSTRUCTION, LLC, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

CA 17–00260

Decided: September 29, 2017

PRESENT:  SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ. KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (JENNIFER S. RECINE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. CHERUNDOLO LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN C. CHERUNDOLO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court