IN RE: MATTHEW E. MAGILL

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

IN RE: MATTHEW E. MAGILL, PETITIONER–RESPONDENT, v. LINDSAY A. ESPOSITO, RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.

CAF 16–01227

Decided: September 29, 2017

PRESENT:  CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ. BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT. PAUL B. WATKINS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAIRPORT, APPELLANT PRO SE. THE WARD FIRM, PLLC, BALDWINSVILLE (MATTHEW E. WARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

PAUL B. WATKINS, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD,

APPELLANT.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court