PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. <<

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v.

CA 14–01560

Decided: April 28, 2017

PRESENT:  WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. JOHN PINCUS, NEW YORK CITY, FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

PRO SE.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988;  Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567;  see also CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court