BRUCE COLEMAN AND ROCHESTER AUTO MAINTENANCE INC PLAINTIFFS APPELLANTS v. CHEVRON INC AND TREMARCO CORP DEFENDANTS RESPONDENTS

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

BRUCE COLEMAN AND ROCHESTER AUTO MAINTENANCE, INC., PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS, v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. AND TREMARCO CORP., DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

CA 16–01910

Decided: April 28, 2017

PRESENT:  PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. KNAUF SHAW LLP, ROCHESTER (ALAN J. KNAUF OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS. WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (BERYL NUSBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court