NICHOLAS DOMINICK AND LORRAINE DOMINICK PLAINTIFFS RESPONDENTS v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

NICHOLAS DOMINICK AND LORRAINE J. DOMINICK, PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES MILLAR & SON CO., CHARLES MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR–IN–INTEREST TO CHARLES MILLAR & SON SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY OF BINGHAMTON, INC., PACEMAKER STEEL & ALUMINUM OF BINGHAMTON CORP., PACEMAKER STEEL AND PIPING CO., INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TO CHARLES MILLAR, PACEMAKER STEEL WAREHOUSE INC., DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CA 16–01638

Decided: April 28, 2017

PRESENT:  WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, ALBANY (GEORGE F. CARPINELLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. BELLUCK & FOX, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (SETH A. DYMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 A.D.2d 435;  see also CPLR 5501[a][1], [2] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court