IRENE HILL AND WILLIAM HILL PLAINTIFFS APPELLANTS v. ET AL DEFENDANT

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

IRENE HILL AND WILLIAM HILL, PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS, v. MICHELLE MCGINNES, JANET S. CANTY, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

CA 16–00032

Decided: December 23, 2016

PRESENT:  WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. BRENNA BOYCE, PLLC, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM P. SMITH, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS. OSBORN REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. REDDY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court