CENTRAL CITY ROOFING COMPANY INC PLAINTIFF APPELLANT v. ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS DEFENDANT RESPONDENT

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

CENTRAL CITY ROOFING COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. ASHLEY MCGRAW ARCHITECTS, D.P.C., DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.

CA 15–01924

Decided: September 30, 2016

PRESENT:  WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ. THE WARD FIRM, PLLC, LIVERPOOL (JON COOPER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT. SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (MATTHEW D. GUMAER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court