BRENDA HARRINGTON PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

BRENDA C. HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. MARY A. BRUNSON, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CA 14–01660

Decided: June 19, 2015

PRESENT:  SMITH, J.P., VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. FORSYTH, HOWE, O'DWYER, KALB & MURPHY, P.C., ROCHESTER (SANFORD R. SHAPIRO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK, PLLC, PITTSFORD (ROBERT D. SCHULTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988;  Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567;  see also CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court