ROBERT BERKLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

ROBERT BERKLEY PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C., PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. THE HISTORIC WOODRUFF BLOCK, LLC, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

CA 13–00111

Decided: February 14, 2014

PRESENT:  SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. RICHARD PALMA, NEW YORK CITY, FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, OSWEGO (SCOTT J. DELCONTE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 A.D.2d 988;  Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts & Roberts, 63 A.D.2d 566, 567;  see also CPLR 5501[a][1] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court