EDWARD LEGARRETA PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

EDWARD A. LEGARRETA, M.D., PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. MELISSA A.L. NEAL, M.D., AND TWENTY 20 EYE CARE AND AESTHETIC OCULOPLASTIC MEDICINE, PLLC, DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

CA 12–01412

Decided: July 05, 2013

PRESENT:  SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. MYERS, QUINN & SCHWARTZ, LLP, WILLIAMSVILLE (JAMES I. MYERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BRADLEY A. HOPPE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Legarreta v. Neal ( [appeal No. 2] _ AD3d _ [July 5, 2013] ).

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court