KURT WIEDENHAUPT PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

KURT A. WIEDENHAUPT, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. PAUL F. HOGAN, JR., DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

CA 11–00072

Decided: November 18, 2011

PRESENT:  PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. DUKE, HOLZMAN, PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (JAMES W. GRESENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (HEATH J. SZYMCZAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Wiedenhaupt v. Hogan ( [appeal No. 2] _ AD3d _ [Nov. 18, 2011] ).

Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court