KELVIN SEAWRIGHT PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT v. APPEAL NO

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

KELVIN SEAWRIGHT, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. OMAR M. CROOKS AND JOE A. RAMBO, JR., DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CA 11–00570

Decided: September 30, 2011

PRESENT:  SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, BUFFALO (NORMAN E.S. GREENE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS. CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., ROCHESTER (RICHARD P. AMICO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 A.D.2d 435;  see also CPLR 5501[a][1], [2] ).

Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court