WARREN v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant.

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Patricia A. WARREN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant.

Decided: April 25, 1997

Before PINE, J.P., and LAWTON, DOERR, BOEHM and FALLON, JJ. Sugarman, Wallace, Manheim & Schoenwald by Timothy Perry, Syracuse, for Appellant, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. David M. Civilette, Dunkirk, for Respondent, P. Warren

Plaintiff sustained injuries when the vehicle she was driving left the roadway, struck a tree stump and overturned.   The complaint alleges, inter alia, that Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (defendant) negligently cut trees along the road under its power lines so that the stumps remained, thereby creating a dangerous condition.   The stump struck by plaintiff's vehicle was 8.7 feet from the paved roadway.

Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.   We agree.   The tree stumps did not present an unreasonable hazard and, thus, defendant was under no duty to remove them (see, Adamy v. Ziriakus, 199 A.D.2d 1018, 605 N.Y.S.2d 583, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 755, 613 N.Y.S.2d 127, 635 N.E.2d 296;  McKenna v. Garcia, 189 A.D.2d 756, 592 N.Y.S.2d 414;  Guy v. Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp., 168 A.D.2d 965, 564 N.Y.S.2d 915, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 808, 570 N.Y.S.2d 488, 573 N.E.2d 576).

The regulations of the New York State Department of Transportation relied upon by plaintiff do not relate to the safety of motorists and apply only to contractors of the State.   Similarly, defendant's Distribution Line Clearance Specifications apply only to contractors hired by defendant and do not create a duty to others.

Order and judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation dismissed.

MEMORANDUM: