Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MINTZ & GOLD, LLP, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. Daniel ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Respondents, Dean Evan Hart, Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered October 3, 2007, which granted so much of the motion by defendants Zimmerman and Steven Cohn, P.C. to dismiss the second cause of action but denied that portion seeking dismissal of the first cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The amended complaint sets forth a cognizable cause of action under Civil Rights Law § 70. Defendants had commenced an action against plaintiff in the name of a corporation at the direction of defendant Hart, who was elected president of that corporation solely as the result of an arbitration award, enforcement of which had been stayed. During the pendency of that action, the Appellate Division, Second Department, vacated the order granting Hart's motion to compel arbitration, finding he had waived his right to arbitration by commencing an action in court. Once the Second Department rendered its decision, the rights and duties of the parties were re-established as if no order had been made (Golde Clothes Shop v. Loew's Buffalo Theatres, Inc., 236 N.Y. 465, 470, 141 N.E. 917 [1923] ). Hart was thus no longer the elected president and lacked the authority to continue prosecuting the action. The allegation that Zimmerman and Steven Cohn, P.C. proceeded with the action maliciously, without the consent of the corporation, states a cause of action under the statute.
As to the cause of action for libel, the statements were made in the course of judicial proceedings, were pertinent to that litigation, and thus were privileged (Sexter & Warmflash, P.C. v. Margrabe, 38 A.D.3d 163, 172, 828 N.Y.S.2d 315 [2007] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)