CRAIG v. Brian W. Lamb, Defendant-Appellant.

Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

John L. CRAIG, Jr. and Delisha M. Robinson, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Danielle L. HAYNOS, Defendant-Respondent, Brian W. Lamb, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: December 31, 2008

PRESENT:  HURLBUTT, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. Cohen & Lombardo, P.C., Buffalo (Melissa A. Cavagnaro of Counsel), for Defendant-Appellant. Nicholas, Perot, Smith, Bernhardt & Zosh, P.C., Akron (Lawrence A. Perot of Counsel), for Plaintiff-Respondent John L. Craig, Jr. Andrews, Bernstein & Maranto, LLP, Buffalo (Andrew J. Connelly of Counsel), for Plaintiff-Respondent Delisha M. Robinson.

Each of the plaintiffs commenced an action seeking damages for injuries each sustained when the vehicle operated by plaintiff Delisha M. Robinson and in which plaintiff John L. Craig, Jr. was a passenger was rear-ended by a vehicle operated by defendant Danielle L. Haynos.   When Robinson's vehicle was rear-ended, it collided with a vehicle operated by defendant Brian W. Lamb. The actions thereafter were consolidated.   Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Lamb seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaints and cross claims against him.   Lamb “failed to meet his burden of establishing that his conduct in stopping his vehicle in the travel lane was not negligent ․, and that such conduct did not cause or contribute to the accident” (Owsian v. Cobo, 45 A.D.3d 1368, 1369, 846 N.Y.S.2d 824).   Indeed, by his own submissions in support of the motion, Lamb raised triable issues of fact whether his actions “ ‘set into motion an eminently foreseeable chain of events that resulted in [the] collision’ between the [Robinson and Haynos] vehicles” (Sheffer v. Critoph, 13 A.D.3d 1185, 1187, 787 N.Y.S.2d 584).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM: