Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Claire GABELMANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIRCLE LINE SIGHTSEEING YACHTS INC., Defendant-Respondent.

Decided: October 20, 1998

NARDELLI, J.P., WALLACH, TOM and ANDRIAS, JJ. Alexander J. Wulwick, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Ronald Betancourt, for Defendant-Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered July 9, 1997, which, upon the grant of defendants' trial motion at the conclusion of plaintiff's case for judgment as a matter of law, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries she sustained when she fell on ice while walking in defendant's parking lot some five hours after the cessation of a nine-inch snowfall and some two and a half hours after defendant's employee had plowed the lot.   We agree with the trial court that plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case.   There was no proof from which the factfinder could reasonably infer that defendant's employee, in the course of removing snow from the subject lot, either created or heightened the hazardous condition that caused plaintiff's injuries (see, Oley v. Village of Massapequa Park, 198 A.D.2d 272, 604 N.Y.S.2d 818;  compare, Glick v. City of New York, 139 A.D.2d 402, 526 N.Y.S.2d 464).   In this connection, the trial court properly exercised its discretion when it determined that plaintiff's proposed witness lacked the breadth of experience necessary to qualify him as an expert in snow plowing (see, Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hosp., Inc., 285 N.Y. 389, 398, 34 N.E.2d 367).