Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

IN RE: Robert J. D'ONOFRIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent-Respondent.

Decided: October 18, 2005

MARLOW, J.P., ELLERIN, WILLIAMS, CATTERSON, McGUIRE, JJ. Jerold E. Levine, New York, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Alan G. Krams of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered August 17, 2004, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondent Police Commissioner's revocation of petitioner's premises residence pistol license and rifle/shotgun permit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

 The finding that petitioner, a civilian employee of the New York City Police Department, violated the terms of his pistol license is rationally supported by petitioner's admission that for eight hours while at work, he left the pistol in the trunk of his car in violation of 38 RCNY 5-22(a)(12).   Live ammunition was also found in the car.   The penalty of revocation does not shock our sense of fairness, even if, as petitioner asserts, he planned to go to a firing range after work (see 38 RCNY 5-23[a][3] [licensee may transport her/his handguns “directly to and from” a small arms range, ammunition to be carried separately] ), and even though his car was parked on police premises.   As the IAS court stated, “an eight hour stopover for work is not a de minimis detour” (see Matter of Gordon v. LaCava, 203 A.D.2d 290, 291, 610 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1994] ).