Reset A A Font size: Print

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David SANABRIA, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: May 29, 2007

FRIEDMAN, J.P., SULLIVAN, SWEENY, CATTERSON, McGUIRE, JJ. Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Lorraine Maddalo of counsel), for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Julie Paltrowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J. at hearing;  Bruce Allen, J. at nonjury trial and sentence), rendered April 29, 2005, convicting defendant of two counts of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion.   At the time of the lineup identification, defendant was in lawful custody based on probable cause.   Although, in the hospital immediately after his injury and at a time when he was disoriented, the victim provided only limited information to the police, he subsequently provided a very detailed description of his attacker, including the distinctive nickname “Punchy,” and defendant fit that description in every respect.   The victim was an identified citizen informant, and the record establishes that he had personal knowledge of defendant's nickname (see People v. Hetrick, 80 N.Y.2d 344, 348, 590 N.Y.S.2d 183, 604 N.E.2d 732 [1992];  compare People v. Parris, 83 N.Y.2d 342, 350, 610 N.Y.S.2d 464, 632 N.E.2d 870 [1994] ).   Given the different circumstances of the two police interviews, the discrepancy between the information that the victim initially and ultimately provided does not undermine its reliability.