STATE EX REL TRIPLETT v. STATE

Reset A A Font size: Print

STATE EX REL. Willie TRIPLETT v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016–KH–1197

Decided: October 09, 2017

 Denied. Relator fails to show entitlement to DNA testing. La.C.Cr.P. art. 926.1. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the court of appeal's written reasons denying relief.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claim has now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

PER CURIAM: