Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-respondent, v. Robin Lavance PERKINS,† Defendant-appellant.
¶1 Robin Perkins formerly leased an apartment from the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin (“the Board”). The Board brought an action to evict Perkins from that apartment in small claims court in Dane County. I think that Perkins wants to appeal an order of the circuit court concerning that eviction. But, Perkins’ notice of appeal and briefing in this court are such that it is impossible to determine what Perkins wants this court to do and the basis for Perkins’ request on appeal. Luckily, the Board's response brief explains the events in the circuit court, and I summarize those now.
¶2 The Board filed an eviction action to remove Perkins from an apartment owned by the Board. Perkins did not appear at the eviction hearing, and a default judgment was entered against Perkins. Perkins filed two motions in the circuit court that the court construed either as a motion to reopen the judgment or for relief from judgment under Wis. Stat. § 806.07. Both motions were denied by the circuit court.
¶3 It is hard to tell anything about what Perkins requests as relief in this appeal. Perkins’ brief-in-chief and reply brief are a jumble of words with nothing that approaches a discernable argument. Wisconsin appellate courts grant some leniency to pro se litigants, like Perkins, in regard to briefing. Waushara Cnty. v. Graf, 166 Wis. 2d 442, 452, 480 N.W.2d 16 (1992). However, a pro se litigant still has to make a recognizable argument as to why a decision of the circuit court should be reversed. See id. Perkins has not done so in this appeal.
¶4 For those reasons Perkins’ appeal is rejected, and the order of the circuit court is affirmed.
By the Court.—Order affirmed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.
FOOTNOTES
FITZPATRICK, J.1 FN1. This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(a) (2019-20). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2019-20 version unless otherwise noted.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Appeal No. 2021AP2220
Decided: June 30, 2022
Court: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)