Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shannon Patrick HAGGETT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph R. VOBORIL, Defendant-Appellant.
¶ 1 In August 2017, Shannon Patrick Haggett filed a small claims summons and complaint against Joseph R. Voboril. Default judgment was entered against Voboril for $1144.50. Voboril subsequently filed a motion to reopen the judgment, which the circuit court denied. Voboril now appeals, but he appeals from the default judgment and not the order denying his motion to reopen.
¶ 2 Wisconsin Stat. § 799.29(1)(a) provides that, in small claims actions, “[t]here shall be no appeal from default judgments, but the trial court may, by order, reopen default judgments upon notice and motion or petition duly made and good cause shown.” Because the default judgment is not an appealable order, we do not have jurisdiction to review this appeal and it must be dismissed.2 Thomas/Van Dyken Joint Venture v. Van Dyken, 90 Wis. 2d 236, 241, 279 N.W.2d 459 (1979) (“If the judgment is not appealable, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the merits of the controversy.”).
By the Court.—Appeal dismissed.
This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4.
FOOTNOTES
2. Wisconsin Stat. § 799.29(1)(a) does not preclude an appeal from an order denying a motion to reopen a default judgment. See General Tel. Co. v. A Corp., 147 Wis. 2d 461, 466, 433 N.W.2d 264 (Ct. App. 1988). But that is not what we have before us.
HAGEDORN, J.1 FN1. This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(a) (2015-16). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2015-16 version unless otherwise noted.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Appeal No. 2017AP2039
Decided: September 12, 2018
Court: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)