Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Termination of Parental Rights of ASHLEY A.T., a Person Under the Age of 18. BROWN COUNTY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. EDWARD C.T., Respondent–Appellant.
Counsel for Edward C.T. has filed a no merit report from an order terminating Edward's parental rights. This court required the no merit report to address the applicability of the no merit procedure to a TPR appeal.1 We conclude that a no merit report may be filed in a TPR appeal within the times set by § 809.107, Stats.
In In Interest of Christopher D., 191 Wis.2d 680, 699–700, 530 N.W.2d 34, 41–42 (Ct.App.1995), responding to an equal protection argument that a parent should have a longer time to appeal a TPR order because he would have 180 days in a no merit appeal, this court held that Rule 809.32, Stats., (no merit reports) does not apply to TPR appeals. That language should not be construed to preclude the filing of a no merit report in a TPR case. Rather, the generous time limits imposed by Rule 809.32, Stats., have been superseded by § 809.107, Stats., in TPR cases. A no merit report may be filed where, as here, the notice of intent and notice of appeal were timely filed under § 809.107(2) and (5), Stats., and the no merit report was filed within the time set for filing the appellant's brief under § 809.107(6)(a), Stats.
Upon the timely filing of a no merit report, this court will allow ten days for the parent to file a response to the report. This time is consistent with the time for filing a respondent's brief under § 809.107(6)(b), Stats. The thirty-day response time set by Rule 809.32, Stats., has been superseded by the shorter deadlines imposed by § 809.107, Stats. Christopher D., 191 Wis.2d at 700, 530 N.W.2d at 42.
Jurisdiction confirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. The merits of the TPR appeal will be decided by separate order.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 98–0075–NM.
Decided: March 31, 1998
Court: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)