CLAUDE WESLY STOOTS v. BOART LONGYEAR COMPANY AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY (2011)

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

CLAUDE WESLY STOOTS v. BOART LONGYEAR COMPANY AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Record No. 1699-10-3

Decided: January 11, 2011

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis

(Ginger J. Largen; J.D. Morefield; Morefield & Largen, on brief), for appellant. (Kevin W. Cloe; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

Claude W. Stoots appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that Stoots did not adequately market his residual work capacity. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Stoots v. Boart Longyear Co., VWC File No. 232-80-81 (July 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. FN*. Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law