Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF UTAH, Mormon Women for Ethical Government, Stefanie Condie, Malcom Reid, Victoria Reid, Wendy Martin, Eleanor Sundwall, Jack Markman, and Dale Cox, Appellees, v. UTAH STATE LEGISLATURE, Utah Legislative Redistricting Committee, Senator Scott Sandall, Representative Mike Schultz, and Senator J. Stuart Adams, Appellants.
¶1 This matter is before the court on interlocutory appeal from the district court's order granting a preliminary injunction. The district court determined that because the constitutional requirements for placing Amendment D on the ballot were not met, “Amendment D is void and shall be given no effect.” The parties have requested expedited review of this matter. In light of that request, we issue the following per curiam order affirming the district court's decision. A published opinion detailing the court's reasoning will follow at a later date.
¶2 Under the express terms of the Utah Constitution, before a proposed amendment can be put to a popular vote, the Legislature “shall cause the [proposed amendment] to be published in at least one newspaper in every county of the state, where a newspaper is published, for two months immediately preceding the next general election.” Utah Const. art. XXIII, § 1. After the publication requirement is met, the amendment “shall be submitted” to the voters. Id. We have previously held that a question must be submitted to voters by placing it “on the ballot in such words and in such form that the voters are not confused thereby.” Nowers v. Oakden, 110 Utah 25, 169 P.2d 108, 116 (1946).
¶3 The district court correctly ruled that neither constitutional prerequisite was met with respect to Amendment D. The Legislature did not cause the amendment to be published in newspapers throughout the state for two months, and the description that will appear on the ballot does not submit the amendment to voters “with such clarity as to enable the voters to express their will.” See id.
¶4 The district court also acted within its discretion in finding that the equities favored a preliminary injunction declaring Amendment D void and ordering that any votes cast will not be counted. Although the voters should have the opportunity to decide whether Amendment D strikes the correct balance between the people's direct legislative power and that of their elected representatives, the public interest requires that constitutional amendments be submitted to voters in the way mandated by the supreme law of the state embodied in the Utah Constitution.
Per Curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 20240965
Decided: September 25, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Utah.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)