LARSEN v. WRIGHT (2012)

Court of Appeals of Utah.

James H. LARSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 20110770–CA.

Decided: January 06, 2012

Before Judges McHUGH, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.

James H. Larsen, Provo, Appellant Pro Se. Peter C. Schofield, Orem, for Appellee.

DECISION

¶ 1 James H. Larsen appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. Larsen failed to respond to the motion. As a result of his failure to respond and the lack of a viable legal issue identified in his docketing statement, he has failed to identify a substantial question for review warranting further consideration by this court. See Utah R.App. P. 10. Absent a substantial issue for review, this court may summarily affirm a district court's order.

¶ 2 Affirmed.

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network