Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: BEYOND MEAT, INC., PROTEIN CONTENT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
TRANSFER ORDER
Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc., moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the Northern District of Illinois or, alternatively, in the Eastern District of New York. This litigation consists of five actions pending in four districts, as listed on Schedule A. In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of a related action pending in the Southern District of Texas.1 Plaintiffs in four of the actions responded to the motion. All support centralization in the Northern District of Illinois. Alternatively, plaintiffs suggest the Southern District of New York as the transferee district.
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that the actions listed on Schedule A involve common questions of fact, and that centralization in the Northern District of Illinois will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions share factual questions arising from allegations that Beyond Meat, which markets and sells plant-based meat substitutes, (1) miscalculates and overstates its products’ protein content; (2) miscalculates and overstates the quality of the products’ protein, which is represented as a percentage of daily value; and (3) misleads consumers into believing that the products provide the same nutritional benefits as traditional meat products.2
These actions thus will entail common discovery regarding the protein in the products as well as Beyond Meat's advertising and labeling practices. All the actions are putative consumer class actions asserting substantially similar claims for violations of state consumer protection statutes, breach of warranties, and unjust enrichment. The putative nationwide and state classes overlap to a large extent. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, particularly with respect to class certification motions; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary.
The Northern District of Illinois is an appropriate transferee district for this litigation. All parties support centralization in this district, which presents an accessible and geographically central venue for this litigation. Two of the actions on the motion, including the first-filed action, are pending in the Northern District of Illinois. We assign this action to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis, who we are confident will steer this litigation on a prudent and expeditious course.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Northern District of Illinois are transferred to the Northern District of Illinois and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Karen K. Caldwell Chair
Nathaniel M. Gorton
David C. Norton
Dale A. Kimball
Matthew F. Kennelly
Roger T. Benitez
Madeline Cox Arleo
IN RE: BEYOND MEAT, INC., PROTEIN CONTENT MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
MDL No. 3059
SCHEDULE A
Northern District of Illinois
ROBERTS, ET AL. v. BEYOND MEAT, INC., C.A. No. 1:22−02861
BOROVOY v. BEYOND MEAT, INC., C.A. No. 1:22−06302
Southern District of Iowa
GARCIA, ET AL. v. BEYOND MEAT, INC., C.A. No. 4:22−00297
Eastern District of New York
CASCIO v. BEYOND MEAT, INC., C.A. No. 2:22−04018
Southern District of New York
MILLER v. BEYOND MEAT, INC., C.A. No. 1:22−06336
FOOTNOTES
1. This and any other related actions are potential tag-along actions. See Panel Rules 1.1(h), 7.1, and 7.2.
2. The products identified in the complaints on the motion include, but are not limited to: (1) Beyond Meat Sausage Plant-Based Dinner Links Hot Italian 14 oz; (2) Beyond Meat Beyond Sausage Plant-Based Dinner Sausage Links Brat Original 14 oz; (3) Beyond Meat Beyond Beef Plant-Based 16 oz Patties; (4) Beyond Meat Beyond Beef Plant-Based Ground Beef; (5) Beyond Meat Beyond Breakfast Sausage Plant-Based Breakfast Patties Classic 7.4 oz; (6) Beyond Meat Beyond Breakfast Sausage Plant-Based Breakfast Patties Spicy 7.4 oz; (7) Beyond Meat Beyond Chicken Plant-Based Breaded Tenders Classic 8 oz; (8) Beyond Meat Beyond Meatballs Italian Style Plant-Based Meatballs 12 count Classic 10 oz; and (9) Beyond Meat Beyond Breakfast Sausage Plant-Based Breakfast Links Classic 8.3 oz.
Before the Panel:* FN* One or more Panel members who could be members of the putative classes in this litigation have renounced their participation in these classes and have participated in this decision.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: MDL No. 3059
Decided: February 01, 2023
Court: United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)