GALLOGLY v. UNITED STATES (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rebecca GALLOGLY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES, Respondent

2020-150

Decided: October 19, 2020

Before Dyk, Wallach, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

Rebecca Gallogly, Pro Se Richard Paul Schroeder, Esq., Trial Attorney, Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent

ON PETITION AND MOTION

ORDER

Rebecca Gallogly petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket submissions entitled “Plaintiff's Amended Objections to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment,” ECF No. 2-1 at 10–28, and “Motion for Leave to File Amended Objections,” ECF No. 2-1 at 29–45. She also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Review of the docket before the Court of Federal Claims shows that these documents were entered on the docket on September 14, 2020. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Aug. 28, 2020), ECF No. 33. Additionally, on September 21, 2020, that court granted Dr. Gallogly's motion for leave to file amended objections. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2020), ECF No. 35.

Because Dr. Gallogly has received the requested relief, we deny her petition as moot.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

(2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law