Skip to main content

HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K., Appellant v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD., Appellee

2019-1890, 2019-1891

Decided: June 15, 2020

(Newman, Lourie, and Schall, Circuit Judges). Jared Weston Newton, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Ryan Seth Goldstein, Los Angeles, CA; David Eiseman, IV, San Francisco, CA; Koichiro Minamino, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC. Carolyn Chang, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Hector Julian Ribera, Ryan J. Marton.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS v. SEMICAPS PTE LTD (2020)

Docket No: 2019-1890, 2019-1891

Decided: June 15, 2020

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard