VOIP PAL COM INC v. TWITTER INC (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless Services LLC, Defendant-Appellee

Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T Corp., Defendant-Appellee

Voip-Pal.com, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Apple, Inc., Defendant-Appellee

2019-1808

Decided: March 16, 2020

(Newman, Lourie, and O’Malley, Circuit Judges). Lewis Emery Hudnell, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Mark Andrew Perry, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Apple, Inc. also represented by Andrew Wilhelm; Ryan Iwahashi, Palo Alto, CA; John M. Desmarais, Ameet Modi, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY; Peter Curtis Magic, San Francisco, CA. Gene Whan Lee, Perkins Coie LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee Twitter, Inc. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Washington, DC. Frank C. Cimino, Jr., Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership. Also represented by Megan S. Woodworth; William Hector, San Francisco, CA. Michael Hawes, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee AT&T Corp. Also represented by Lauren J. Dreyer, Washington, DC. Lewis Emery Hudnell, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, for amici curiae Raymond A. Mercado, RPost Holdings, Incorporated, RPost Communications Limited, RMail Limited.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Per Curiam