UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE v. United States Capitol Police Labor Committee, Intervenor (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent United States Capitol Police Labor Committee, Intervenor

2017-2060, 2017-2062, 2017-2063, 2017-2064

Decided: November 06, 2018

Before Dyk, Linn, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

Frederick M. Herrera, Office of Employment Counsel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by Rafique Omar Anderson, Kelly Marissa Scindian. John D. Uelmen, Office of the General Counsel, United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Julia Akins Clark. Megan Kathleen Mechak, Woodley & McGillivary LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.

The petitions for review are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this court. See U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of Compliance, Nos. 2017-2061, 2018-1504, slip op. at 8–12, 908 F.3d 748, –––– – ––––, 2018 WL 5795975 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2018).

No costs.

DISMISSED

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network