ASGHARI KAMRANI v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nader ASGHARI-KAMRANI, Kamran Asghari-Kamrani, Appellants v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellee

2018-1040,

Decided: September 11, 2018

Before Dyk, Wallach, and Hughes, Circuit Judges.

SUA SPONTE Antigone Gabriella Peyton, Brian Michael Wotring, Esq., Attorney, Protorae Law PLLC, Tysons, VA, Reece Werner, Nienstadt PLLC, Washington, DC, for Appellants Michael J. McKeon, Esq., Ahmed Jamal Davis, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, Matthew C. Berntsen, Attorney, Fish & Richardson, PC, Boston, MA, Craig E. Countryman, Fish & Richardson, PC, San Diego, CA, Michael T. Zoppo, Esq., Fish & Richardson, P.C., New York, NY, for Appellee

ORDER

Upon consideration of the above-captioned appeals,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) These appeals (Nos. 2018-1040 and 2018-1041) are dismissed as moot, and the decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board are vacated in view of our affirmance of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s judgment of patent ineligibility in Asghari-Kamrani v. United Services Auto-mobile Ass’n, Appeal Nos. 2016-2415, 2017-2101, and 2017-2191, and the parties’ agreement at oral argument that affirmance of the district court’s in-eligibility decision has the effect of invalidating all claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,266,432.

(2) No costs.

PER CURIAM.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law