Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP., Defendant–Cross–Appellant.
ORDER
This case was argued before a panel of this court on July 9, 2012. Thereafter, a poll of the judges in regular active service was conducted to determine whether the jurisdictional issues raised by this appeal should be heard en banc.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The court by its own action grants a hearing en banc.
(2) The parties are requested to file new en banc briefs limited to the following questions:
a) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when a trial on damages has not yet occurred?
b) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when willfulness issues are outstanding and remain undecided?
(3) An original and thirty copies of the new en banc briefs shall be filed, and two copies of each en banc brief shall be served on opposing counsel. Plaintiff–Appellant's en banc brief is due 40 days from the date of this order. Defendant–Cross–Appellant's en banc response brief is due within 40 days of service of Plaintiff–Appellant's new en banc brief, and Plaintiff–Appellant's reply brief is due within 14 days of service of Defendant–Cross–Appellant's response brief. Principal briefs shall not exceed 7,000 words, and the reply brief shall not exceed 3,500 words.
(4) Briefs of amici curiae will be entertained. Any such amici briefs may be filed without consent and leave of court, and shall not exceed 7,000 words, but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Any such briefs shall be limited to the questions above.
(5) Oral argument will be scheduled at a later date.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Nos. 2011–1363, 2011–1364.
Decided: August 07, 2012
Court: United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)