DE TAGLE v. COMCAST CORP (2026)

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Orlando Sanchez DE TAGLE, Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CORP., Defendant.

Case No. 26-cv-04031-PCP

Decided: September 14, 2026

Orlando Sanchez de Tagle, San Jose, CA, Pro Se.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 4, 11

Having reviewed Chief Magistrate Judge Cousins's Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well founded in law and consistent with this Court's own view of the Record. It is hereby ordered that the Report and Recommendation is incorporated by reference and adopted in its entirety. See Dkt. No. 11. Accordingly, the Court orders this case dismissed without prejudice for Mr. de Tagle's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's deadlines. The Court also denies Mr. de Tagle's motion for preliminary and permanent injunctions, Dkt. No. 4, which is based on an implausible complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

P. Casey Pitts, United States District Judge

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network