HART v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS INC (2026)

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Eugene HART, Plaintiff, v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS INC., et al., Defendants.

Case No. 26-cv-04463-PCP

Decided: September 01, 2026

Eugene Hart Jr., San Francisco, CA, Pro Se.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 7

Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim's Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 7, and prior screening order incorporated therein, Dkt. No. 5, are well founded in law and consistent with this Court's own view of the record. It is hereby ordered that the Report and Recommendation is incorporated by reference and adopted in its entirety. See Dkt. No. 7. Accordingly, the Court orders this case dismissed without prejudice for Mr. Hart's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

P. Casey Pitts, United States District Judge

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network