MULLIGAN FUNDING LLC v. TOMMY INTERIOR CONTRACTING CORP (2025)

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

MULLIGAN FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff, v. TOMMY INTERIOR CONTRACTING CORP., Thanas Pando, Defendants.

23-CV-8808 (RER) (JAM)

Decided: February 11, 2025

Anne J. Penachio, Penachio Malara, LLP, White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

In a report and recommendation dated November 11, 2024, (ECF No. 25 (the “R&R”)), Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Marutollo recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff's second motion for default against Defendant Thanas Pando (“Pando”). (R&R at 1). Plaintiff's earlier motion for default was previously granted with respect to Defendant Tommy Interior Contracting Corp. (R&R at 1–2).

Judge Marutollo advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of the R&R to file objections. (Id.). To date, neither party has filed an objection. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Therefore, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

RAMÓN E. REYES, JR., United States District Judge:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network