Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AUDI PINEDA, Defendant.
ORDER
Defendant Audi Pineda is currently detained at the Wyatt Detention Center on four counts in a Superceding Indictment. At his arraignment, he rejected a court appointed counsel and decided to proceed pro se. As the case proceeds to trial, the government requested a Faretta hearing, and one was scheduled and noticed for April 3, 2025. The United States Marshall Service (“USMS”) reported from Wyatt that morning that Mr. Pineda refused to leave his cell to attend the Faretta hearing. USMS advised the Court that officers did not recommend an extraction procedure at this time for a variety of reasons and the Court took that advice.
The Court conducted a recorded hearing in Mr. Pineda's absence and concluded that the trial clock on the counts in the Superceding Indictment would stop in accordance with the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(3)(A) (“resulting from the absence or unavailability of the defendant”) and (B) (“a defendant․ shall be considered absent when his whereabouts are unknown and, in addition, he is attempting to avoid apprehension or prosecution *** a defendant ․ shall be considered unavailable whenever his whereabouts are known but his presence for trial cannot be obtained by due diligence or he resists appearing at or being returned for trial.”), which essentially states that the clock stops when a defendant is unavailable because he resists appearing for court. In this instance, Mr. Pineda's refusal to attend Court today was him purposeless absenting himself from the Court for prosecution of his case.
Mr. Pineda is ordered to appear in Court when the Court next notices and dockets a hearing in his case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
John J. McConnell, Jr. Chief United States District Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: C.A. No. 23-CR-114-JJM-LDA
Decided: April 03, 2025
Court: United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)