Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ASHLEY WADE SICLOVAN, Defendant.
ORDER
Because clear error is present in the Court's Amended Opinion and Order, ECF [78], issued on July 12, 2024, the government's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF [83], is GRANTED. Upon review, the Court agrees that amended U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 is an applicable policy statement, constituting binding authority. The Court, however, followed U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13’s persuasive authority in its original analysis, and thus finds that a sentence of time served, with the imposed conditions listed in the Amended Opinion and Order, is still warranted.
The Court therefore amends its Amended Opinion and Order as follows:
(1) The Court deletes the last sentence of the first paragraph on page five, reading, “Thus, because the Ninth Circuit has indicated, and continues to indicate post-amendment, that U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 is not an ‘applicable policy statement,’ this Court will continue to treat § 1B1.13 as persuasive, nonbinding authority.” The Court replaces the sentence with “This Court follows § 1B1.13, whether as ‘persuasive’ or ‘binding’ precedent.”
(2) The Court adds the following sentence at the end of the third paragraph on page eleven: “For the same reasons that the facts and circumstances here support a sentence of time served under the § 3553(a) factors, the Court also determines that defendant's release under the conditions specified in the amended judgment will not endanger the community under § 1B1.13.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 22nd day of August, 2024.
Adrienne Nelson United States District Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Case No. 3:16-cr-00256-AN
Decided: August 22, 2024
Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)