MARVEL JONES v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (2021)

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for court-appointed counsel. (Filing No. 4). A civil litigant has no constitutional or statutory right to a court-appointed attorney. The court may, however, make such an appointment at its discretion. Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996). A trial court has broad discretion to decide whether both the pro se party and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel, taking into account the factual and legal complexity of the case, the presence or absence of conflicting testimony, and the pro se party's ability to investigate the facts and present or defend the claims. Id. The court may also consider whether and to what extent the unrepresented party made any effort to retain counsel before seeking court-appointed counsel.

Considering all these factors, the court finds appointment of counsel is not warranted under the facts presented. The claims and defenses at issue are not factually or legally complex, Plaintiff has previously litigated his claims alleged inadequate access to legal aides and library resources, (see Jones v. Britten, 4:06-cv-03314-LSC-PRSE), his claims appear to be time-barred, and there is no showing of any efforts made by Plaintiff to locate counsel without court assistance. Plaintiff is able to adequately litigate the claims and defenses without the assistance of counsel. Id. See also, 28 U.S.C § 1915(a).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Plaintiff's motion for appointed counsel, (Filing No. 4), is denied.

2) On or before September 20, 2021, Plaintiff shall either: (a) obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance in this case; or (b) file a statement notifying the court of his intent to litigate this case without the assistance of counsel. The failure to do so may result in a dismissal of Plaintiff's claims without further notice.

Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge