Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America v. Juan Alberto ROSA-MARTE, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
This case arises from charges against defendant, Juan Alberto Rosa-Marte (“defendant”), for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 841. Defendant pled guilty to these charges in 2021. He was sentenced to 30 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release which began in 2023. Now, defendant moves for early termination of his probation based on good behavior, to which neither the government nor the Probation Office filed an opposition.
Regardless of the merits of defendant's motion, if any, the motion will be denied because this Court no longer has jurisdiction over his supervised release. In February, 2024, the Probation Office filed a request with this Court to transfer jurisdiction from this Court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“the Southern District”), which is closer to where defendant currently resides (Docket No. 64). This Court authorized the transfer (Docket No. 65), and the transferee court accepted it. See 18 U.S.C. § 3605 (permitting district courts to transfer probation jurisdiction with consent of transferee court).
Accordingly, this Court now lacks authority to authorize a request to modify defendant's supervised release; any such request must be filed with the Southern District. See id. (“A court to which jurisdiction is transferred under this section is authorized to exercise all powers over the probationer.”); cf. United States v. Sastrom, 96 F.4th 33, 34 (1st Cir. 2024) (recognizing courts “lack authority to adjust [defendant]’s supervised release” once a case is transferred to another district pursuant to § 3605).
ORDER
For the foregoing reasons, the motion defendant, Juan Alberto Rosa-Marte, for early termination of supervised release (Docket No. 67) is DENIED without prejudice.
Defendant may refile his motion for early termination, if he so chooses, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
So ordered.
GORTON, United States District Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Criminal Action No. 21-10017-NMG
Decided: November 21, 2024
Court: United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)