Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PFLAG, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP ET AL., Defendants.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF 69, is GRANTED.1 It is further
ORDERED that Defendants U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of HHS; the Health Resources and Services Administration (“HRSA”); Diana Espinosa, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Administrator of HRSA; the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”); Matthew J. Memoli, in his official capacity as Acting NIH Director; the National Science Foundation (“NSF”); Sethuraman Panchanathan, in his official capacity as Director of NSF; any subagencies of Defendant HHS, their officers, agents, successors, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other persons who are in active concert or participation with them, are ENJOINED from conditioning, withholding, or terminating federal funding under Section 3(g) of Executive Order 14,168 and Section 4 of Executive Order 14,187, based on the fact that a healthcare entity or health professional provides gender-affirming medical care to a patient under the age of nineteen; it is further
ORDERED that Defendants must provide written notice of the Court's preliminary injunction to all Defendants and their employees, contractors, and grantees by March 10, 2025. The written notice shall instruct the aforementioned groups that Defendants may not take any steps to implement, give effect to, or reinstate under a different name the directives in Section 3(g) of Executive Order 14,168 or Section 4 of Executive Order 14,187 that condition or withhold federal funding based on the fact that a healthcare entity or health professional provides gender-affirming medical care to a patient under the age of nineteen. The written notice shall also instruct Defendant agencies to release any disbursements on funds that were paused due to the Executive Orders; it is further
ORDERED that the preliminary injunction remains in effect pending further orders from this Court; it is further
ORDERED that Defendants shall file a status report on or before March 11, 2025, apprising the Court of the status of Defendants’ compliance with this Order, including by providing a copy of the written notice described above; it is further
ORDERED that no security bond is required because Defendants will not suffer any costs from the preliminary injunction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c).
FOOTNOTES
1. For the purposes of this preliminary injunction, “Defendants” herein refers to all Defendants listed in the amended complaint except President Trump.
Brendan A. Hurson United States District Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Civil No. 25-337-BAH
Decided: March 04, 2025
Court: United States District Court, D. Maryland.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)