WEIDRICK v. BIDEN (2021)

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Mary Jo WEIDRICK, Appellant v. Joseph R. BIDEN, Jr., President and United States Congress, parties acting in both professional and personal capacities, Appellees

No. 21-5067

Decided: May 13, 2021

BEFORE: Tatel and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

Mary Jo Weidrick, Pro Se R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney's Office, (USA) Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant, including a request to expedite this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order, filed March 4, 2021, be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the case as frivolous. See Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305, 1307–08 (D.C. Cir. 1981) (“A court may dismiss as frivolous complaints ․ postulating events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind.”). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the request to expedite this appeal be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law