CORSI v. MUELLER III (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jerome CORSI, Appellant v. Robert S. MUELLER, III, an individual, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Special Counsel, et al., Appellees

No. 19-5314

Decided: September 02, 2020

Before: Srinivasan, Chief Judge, and Tatel, Circuit Judge, and Silberman, Senior Circuit Judge

Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner, Pro Se

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this appeal on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. R. 34(j). The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d).

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court entered October 31, 2019, dismissing appellant's amended complaint and denying appellant leave to file a second amended complaint be AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion filed the same day.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36(d), this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41(a)(1).

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law