GRANT II v. HARRIS AUSA (2019)

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s April 17, 2019 order be affirmed. The district court properly determined that appellant failed to plead sufficient allegations against the appellees, and appellant has shown no error in the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (requiring a “short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction” and “of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief”); see also Grant v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, No. 18-cv-1806 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2018), aff’d, No. 18-5270, 752 F. Appx. 5 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 8, 2019).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam