Skip to main content


United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jin O. JIN, Appellee v. PARSONS CORPORATION, Appellant

No. 19-7019

Decided: June 25, 2019

BEFORE: Pillard, Katsas, and Rao, Circuit Judges John Thomas Harrington, Robert Scott Oswald, The Employment Law Group, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff - Appellee Joseph Erwin Schuler, Jackson Lewis PC, Reston, VA, for Defendant - Appellant


Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

Docket No: No. 19-7019

Decided: June 25, 2019

Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard