CHAPMAN III ISBC ESD II v. HEATH (2019)

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on appellant’s brief and appendix. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case be remanded for further proceedings. The district court dismissed appellant’s complaint for failure to file by March 9, 2018, “the full name and address of each defendant,” as directed by the court. On appeal, however, in the appendix to his brief, appellant has submitted a list of the defendants’ names and addresses that bears the caption for Case No. 17-cv-1735 and a date stamp of March 8, 2018. Appellant avers that he mailed the “Registry of Defendants” to the district court on March 5, 2018, but it was returned to him. This submission suggests that appellant may have complied with the court’s instructions, although the document does not appear on the civil docket. On remand, appellant may submit this document for the district court to consider whether the complaint was properly dismissed, and the district court may conduct further proceedings as appropriate.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam