MENDEZ v. TRUMP (2018)

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(1); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed June 7, 2018, be affirmed. Appellant does not challenge on appeal the district court's holding that a challenge to his confinement may be brought by means of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See 18 U.S.C. § 4247(g). And, to the extent appellant raises claims for relief other than a challenge to his confinement, he has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to a writ of mandamus. See Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 381, 124 S.Ct. 2576, 159 L.Ed.2d 459 (2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam