UNITED STATES v. SLATTEN (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Nicholas Abram SLATTEN, Appellant

No. 18-3001

Decided: February 09, 2018

BEFORE: Rogers, Griffith, and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges

Peter S. Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, (USA) Civil Division, Washington, DC, Elizabeth Trosman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USAO Appellate Counsel, U.S. Attorney's Office, (USA) Appellate Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee Thomas G. Connolly, Esquire, Steven Arthur Fredley, Esquire, Attorney, Jared Paul Marx, Attorney, Timothy J. Simeone, Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda of law and fact and pleadings filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36. It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s December 22, 2017 ruling denying appellant’s motion for release pending trial be affirmed. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law